Orderly Worship

“Well, my brothers and sisters, let’s summarise. When you meet together, one will sing, another will teach, another will tell some special revelation God has given, one will speak in tongues, and another will interpret what is said. But everything that is done must strengthen all of you. No more than two or three should speak in tongues. They must speak one at a time, and someone must interpret what they say. But if no one is present who can interpret, they must be silent in your church meeting and speak in tongues to God privately.”
1 Corinthians 14:26-28 NLT

Paul set out the liturgy for an orderly meeting in these verses from 1 Corinthians 14, and today, many churches adhere to it. He didn’t specify the order in which these things should happen, but the simplicity of a Pauline worship service is refreshing in comparison to the liturgies applied in established denominations. I’m writing this blog on the first day of Advent, and the Anglican order of service includes a typical Holy Communion structure, beginning with an introductory rite, a processional hymn, the lighting of the first Advent candle, and readings from scripture such as Isaiah 2:1-5 and a gospel reading like Matthew 24:36-44 or Mark 13:24-37. The service also features psalms, prayers, a sermon, and communion. All good stuff, I’m sure, but what happened to the simplicity that marked Paul’s instructions? In the Pentecostal church I attend, the service starts with an opening prayer and some initial thoughts from the person leading the meeting. This is followed by a time of worship, during which several songs or hymns are sung, after which there is an opportunity for additional prayers and prophetic messages. A sermon will follow, including readings from the Bible, then a final song and a closing prayer. But at any time, there are opportunities to vary the order of service to focus on the Holy Spirit. A Spirit-led meeting is essential. That may be possible with a fixed liturgy, but it is perhaps a bit more difficult.

In some social gatherings today, there is what is called an “Open Mic” night, where those present take turns to sing or play a musical instrument, for the entertainment of all. Not everyone joins in, but it is an ordered time, usually convened by the host or another person in authority. This seems to be much of what Paul is advocating, with people taking turns to bring a song or hymn, possibly taken from the Psalms, another bringing a message in tongues, as long as there is someone there to interpret what is being said, a prophetic message that Paul called a “special revelation”, and a time of teaching, the sermon. Perhaps the Corinthians already had something similar in place, but without the order that Paul proposed.

But the thread running through all that Paul proposed had two important and intertwined aims. These were, first and foremost, an order of events honouring God in a place where the Holy Spirit could move, coupled with the need to edify the body of Christ, the church. The order of Paul’s service was not a dusty and lifeless liturgy that had lost its Holy Spirit spark many years before, a religious event lacking spontaneity and relevance. Instead, it was infused with the expectation that the believers were about to meet God, in a time full of love and a desire to build up fellow believers through events and opportunities all led by the Holy Spirit. 

The believers wanted Jesus.

At the end of Acts 2, we find a few verses that describe how the first converts to Christianity spent their time together. Acts 2:42, “All the believers devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching, and to fellowship, and to sharing in meals (including the Lord’s Supper), and to prayer”. And Acts 2 ends with “ … the Lord added to their number daily those who were being saved“. There was something about the simplicity of those early days. The believers didn’t want a liturgy. They wanted Jesus. In Acts 2:42, we read, “Every day they continued to meet together in the temple courts. They broke bread in their homes and ate together with glad and sincere hearts“. We should note two things here: the believers engaged in corporate prayer and worship as they met together in the Temple, and they shared Jesus with each other in the more intimate settings of a home group. Perhaps today, we should seek a return to the early Church model, and once again put Jesus before all other considerations.

Dear Father God. Please help us return to our first love, those days when we discovered Jesus for ourselves. We re so grateful for all He did for us at Calvary, and we praise and worship You today. Amen.

Practice Hospitality

“When God’s people are in need, be ready to help them. Always be eager to practice hospitality.”
Romans 12:13 NLT

Paul’s pastoral heart emerges with the verse we are considering this morning. He was concerned with the social needs of his day, and, in particular, the needs of the early Christians. Note that he didn’t start this verse with an “if”, but rather with a “when”. It was a reality that in the early church there were some who were needy. But what was the “need” that Paul observed?

The counter-cultural faith of the early Christians was considered subversive by the Roman-orientated government and societies of their time. And there was a reaction to them, that made it difficult for the early believers to be in business, or be involved with the non-Christians around them. They were too different, with their Gospel that there is only one true God. Their sexual ethics were distinct, promoting chaste behaviour and monogamic relationships between husbands and wives. They were anti-abortionists.  They refused to worship the  gods of their neighbours, considering it idolatry. They promoted a faith that was based on a love relationship with God, and salvation through grace. They were a community. They were, in fact, so different to the peoples around them that they both attracted and repelled them, and the church growth at that time was dramatic. 

But the reaction against them in their societies resulted in their having “needs”. Social justice was a part of the early church ethos, so why did Paul have to remind them of their obligations? Don’t forget that the church in Rome was an amalgam of Jewish and Gentile Christians, and perhaps some of the rivalry, even dislike, prevailed. Also, within the growing nascent church, it would have been easy to overlook those particularly on the margins. Paul wasn’t specific about which needs should be helped. He was just encouraging the people to look out for them and help them in whatever way possible. The second half of today’s verse mentions “hospitality”. Be eager to practice it, he wrote. Perhaps he was saying to these early Christians, invite God’s people around for a meal. A coffee and chat. )pen up your homes and have a party, he was perhaps saying.

To provide a clue of how the early church started can be found in the last few verses of Acts 2, “And all the believers met together in one place and shared everything they had. They sold their property and possessions and shared the money with those in need. They worshiped together at the Temple each day, met in homes for the Lord’s Supper, and shared their meals with great joy and generosity— all the while praising God and enjoying the goodwill of all the people. And each day the Lord added to their fellowship those who were being saved” (Acts 2:44-47). Counter-cultural? If that described our local churches today we would be living in a different society.

There are those today, concerned with social justice, who look to the state to provide for people’s needs. The response expected is one of finance. Increase the benefits and eliminate poverty, they demand. More universal credit and state pensions. More housing benefit and council tax concessions. The demands are strident and never seem to end. I should point out that I agree that needy people should be helped, but, sadly, we have become confused between what is a “need” and what is a “want”. The early church made sure that people were fed – Acts 6:1, “But as the believers rapidly multiplied, there were rumblings of discontent. The Greek-speaking believers complained about the Hebrew-speaking believers, saying that their widows were being discriminated against in the daily distribution of food”. Note that the need at the time was for feeding those who were unable to feed themselves because of their status in society – widows. And perhaps Paul knew that the same problem between different factions – Jews and Gentiles – in the Roman church was already present elsewhere. But they dealt with it. Needs were met.

So how does Romans 12:13 impact us today? How do we pilgrims respond? The main feature for me is that the early church was growing explosively because it was different. Their morals, their community, their focus on one God, who loved them, cared for them, and had saved them through His Son Jesus, were so counter-cultural that they polarised society. The early Christians upset the idol worshippers around them because they refused to accommodate and recognise their many goods. They were society confronters, and not afraid of the consequences, even being prepared to die for their faith in God. Perhaps we have an opportunity today to confront a new reincarnation of the Roman deities – the gender ideologies. We have to point out to society around us that their “need” is not the ability to change gender at whim but instead it is to embrace the one true God. We have the right and true message. How are we promoting it? Are we hunkered down with our heads below the parapet, hoping the problem will go away? or are we too, like those early believers, willing to face the consequences of being society-confronters.

But back to “When God’s people are in need, be ready to help them”. Peoples’ needs are many and often complex. We immediately think of the the basics of life such as food and drink, warmth and shelter. But most of the time in our societies there are many others. In the news this morning there are statistics reported that show a pandemic of mental health issues amongst the young people in the UK. In my community the biggest issue is not financial. It is loneliness. And the community of “God’s people” is not immune from these problems. We pilgrims need to be aware of people’s needs, and not be put off by the “fine” response at the church door. Thankfully, we have the Holy Spirit with us, and He is willing and able to empower us to discern the needs before us. Fulfilling Paul’s entreaty to “be ready” will cost us. Our time and money. OIur reputations and even our careers. Much prayer is needed. We probably won’t see any rewards in this life but one day we will near those precious words, “Well done …”.

Dear Father God. We worship You today. Thank You for Your loving kindness, and always being there for us in our times of need. Amen.